Seminar series
Indicators of wellbeing and their measurement/ analysis
26 February 2016, the University of Sheffield.
Convenors: Dr Christine Sprigg, Dr Sam Farley and Ann-Marie Thomas
This seminar examined what indicators we might try to look for within organisational and digital data that would provide evidence for poor health and wellbeing. It also examined what we know about the dynamic nature of wellbeing over time, its measurement and analysis. The implications of this evidence for Big Data analysis will also be explored.
Speakers
Jeff Stich (PhD student), Lancaster University
Dr Noelle Chesley, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, USA
Professor Jeremy Dawson, the University of Sheffield
Professor Christian Dormann, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
Dr Noelle Chesley
Unhealthy ICT Related (Work) Practices: What are they? How might we measure them?
Dr Noel Chesley’s presentation (PDF, 467KB)
Abstract:
Work scholars have identified a number of key practices facilitated through information and communication technology (ICT) use that promote work-life extension and intensification in ways that detract from worker wellbeing.
What are “extension” and “intensification” and how are these processes initiated and supported by our ICT infrastructure? How might extension and intensification processes, and their associated practices, detract from worker health and wellbeing? How should future research engage the changing nature of work, work organisations, and shifting connections among employers and workers to better theorise and measure the role that ICT-based practices play in shaping unhealthy work conditions?
Jeff Stich
Wellbeing, technology use and attitudes towards technology
Jeff Stich’s presentation (PDF, 974KB)
Abstract:
Big Data facilitates the collection of large amounts of measures on objective usage of technology such as number of emails sent or received or response time. Such objective variables might however be unreliable indicators of wellbeing due to the subjectivity involved in the appraisal process. For instance, a same amount of emails might be considered stressful by one individual but not by the other.
This presentation will thus explore
the links between attitudes towards technology and wellbeing
the measurement of subjective indicators of technology use
the impact of both actual and perceived technology use on wellbeing using Person-Environment fit approaches
Temporal dynamics of wellbeing
Abstract:
For capturing dynamics in work stress and wellbeing, conducting multiple measurements across time is necessary, but it is not sufficient. Any measurement reflects a snapshot at a discrete time point only.
Important questions are:
How discrete measurements can be used to analyse continuous (ie dynamic) relations among work stress and wellbeing?
How to optimally design the spacing (lags) of measurements and the length of studies?
I will introduce some recent developments, which have demonstrated how discrete measurements can be related to their underlying continuous time (CT) processes and how this can be implemented in structural equation models (SEM). I will also show how the optimal spacing of measurements can be computed (using continuous or discrete time analyses), and discuss implications for the design of studies.
Analysing organisational indicators of wellbeing
Professor Jeremy Dawson’s presentation (PDF, 476KB)
Abstract:
Jeremy will present some findings on the relationship between organisational data and wellbeing. He will examine issues related to statistical analysis across multiple data sources and different levels of analysis.
All seminars
Seminar 1 – Examining the relationship between IT working practises and ill health
Seminar 2 – Indicators of wellbeing and their measurement/ analysis
Seminar 5 – The benefits and dis-benefits of monitoring digital data for health purposes